Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guy Savoie (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 15:03, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Guy Savoie

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. WP:BLP of a person notable only as a city councillor, in a city not internationally prominent enough to hand its city councillors an WP:NPOL pass, and as a non-winning candidate for higher office. While consensus formerly accepted Winnipeg as a city that got its councillors into Wikipedia on the grounds that it was listed in the article on global city, that's more recently been deprecated because it was listed only in the "sufficiency" class of quasi-global cities and not as a true alpha, beta or gamma class world city. But what we have for sourcing here is not enough to get him over WP:GNG in lieu -- this is based on just two pieces of media coverage which both just namecheck his existence in the process of being about something or somebody else, with no sources that are substantively about him. That's not the kind of sourcing it takes to demonstrate a city councillor as more notable than the norm, which is the standard that Winnipeg's city councillors now have to meet. Bearcat (talk) 20:15, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 20:17, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Manitoba-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 20:17, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete members of city councils at this level are not default notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:15, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:POLOUTCOMES. Bearian (talk) 22:46, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as the text in the article is not supported by the citations and there are no references easily available. Bangabandhu (talk) 23:41, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per above.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 12:00, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.