Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guy-Manuel de Homem-Christo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 05:02, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Guy-Manuel de Homem-Christo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One half of the notable electronic duo Daft Punk but no indication of independent notability. Merge or redirect to Daft Punk.

Also nominating:
(1) Crydamoure (vanity label of Guy-Manuel de Homem-Christo)
- TheMagnificentist 15:56, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Subject has produced a number of notable works without Bangalter, for example Sexuality (album) and Outrun (album). See also WP:MUSICBIO, as was pointed out in the similar deletion discussion about the Bangalter article. I would agree that the Guy-Man de Homem-Christo article needs some work, but that has more to do with lack of editor interest than lack of notability as an individual subject. jhsounds (talk) 22:03, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 22:39, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 22:40, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Note that two articles are nominated for deletion herein. Consider this relisting as not applicable as an actual relisting, because the {{Article for deletion}} template was not added to the Crydamoure article when this nomination was created. I added the template atop the article moments ago.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:57, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural keep on Crydamoure. Crydamoure is not a "vanity label" as it has numerous releases from artists other than Homem-Christo. It's fair to say it started as a vanity label, but subsequent releases indicate it grew from there. I am not commenting on the notability or lack thereof on the Crydamoure label, but it needs to be considered on its own merits independent of its founder, therefore I am requesting a procedural keep here, and a separate AfD nomination if appropriate. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 13:24, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.