Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gustafson v. Payless
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep (non-admin closure). The case seems important for the interpretation of the Oregon's law on shoplifting. Ruslik (talk) 08:18, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Gustafson v. Payless (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This article deals with a non-notable court case over a minor charge. The article's "facts" are written in a very pro-plaintiff POV and a NPOV version of the article is unlikely to be written as the case was not an influential one. Escape Artist Swyer Talk to me The mess I've made 21:20, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:21, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Cases decided by the Oregon Supreme Court are automatically notable due to its effect on Oregon law. No problem with the deletion of huge chunks of the article that violate WP:NPOV. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 01:06, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep -- on the assumption that this is a case that is regarded as a significant precedent for the interpretation of Oregon state law on theft. I do not accept that all cases reaching the highest court of a nation or state are necessarily notable. Notability is probably best established by cases being cited regularly as a precedent in later cases. Being in England, I am not qulaified to judge the importance of the case. Peterkingiron (talk) 23:19, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as nom. Is anything in this article worth keeping? -- Escape Artist Swyer Talk to me The mess I've made 10:02, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.