Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guruji.com
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. North America1000 00:26, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
Guruji.com[edit]
- Guruji.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete Does not meet notability guidelines and also fails WP:CORP Doublefrog (talk) 05:21, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- Doublefrog has been blocked indef as part of a sockpuppet investigation. Epeefleche (talk) 22:39, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 May 5. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:45, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:50, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:50, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:27, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Early Internet company is not grounds for notability Shii (tock) 22:13, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Not notable in the least. Ormr2014 (talk) 23:44, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.