Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gunilla Sköld-Feiler (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Snow White and The Madness of Truth. There seems to be a broad consensus that the subject is not notable independently from her controversial art installation. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:26, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gunilla Sköld-Feiler

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previous discussion was closed as non consensus, but I'd like to generate more thorough discussion for this artist, who in my POV lack notability and known only for one work. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 09:53, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 10:08, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to article on Snow White and the Madness of Truth.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:57, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:56, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e^talk 00:29, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - This article was through a afD less than a few weeks back. And in fact the article was kept with No consensus at 01:05 on 4 December and this afD was initiated at 09, that is highly questionable. it is still WP:GNG and the sources are good. The article needs improvements for sure. Continuing to push for a article to be deleted to soon after an Afd is weird.BabbaQ (talk) 11:19, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It should not have been relisted so soon. But the article could certainly be expanded.--Ipigott (talk) 11:35, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Closing admin Joyous! of deletion discussion #1 just a few weeks ago says to discuss on talk page, yet there's absolutely no discussion on the talk page. Per my original comment, American Google News search indicates WP:GNG] criteria met. Article could use expansion and improved referencing, not deletion per WP:ATD. Hmlarson (talk) 18:01, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

comment on sourcing to keep, we would need substantive discussions of her work - more than just "Snow White"; stuff like profiles of her; museum shows; something to show that she is noteworthy beyond a single, controversial installation. I have searched but cannot find it. Even the "Snow White" installation was a mere temporary sensation that caught a news cycle; I cannot find being discussed as a significant moment in either the history of art or of political propaganda.E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:48, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 14:35, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 14:35, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Palestine-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 14:35, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I would have preferred a discussion first as this was closed recently as a no consensus. Notifying contributors of previous AfD Shrike and E.M.Gregory who have not commented here. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 14:38, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Snow White and The Madness of Truth per WP:BLP1E, WP:NOTNEWS and WP:NOPAGE. The subject seems to be notable only in association with the controversial artwork. The nature of coverage is all about the artwork and hardly gives significant focus on the subject. There is nothing else to show that the subject is independently notable. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 14:39, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Snow White and The Madness of Truth My searches did turn up a few hits on her name, but all of them that I clicked on were about the 2004 "Snow White" project; even the more recent articles, of which there were very few.E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:53, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
After reading about I also agree with Redirect to Snow White and The Madness of Truth. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 10:13, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.