Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gundam Sandrock

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Gundam Wing mobile suits. MBisanz ^talk 16:34, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gundam Sandrock[edit]

This fictional weapon does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 18:35, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - According to the article's talk page, there was allready a consensus previously to merge the article with List of Mobile Suits of Gundam Wing; it just seems that the merger was never done. I propose that we honor that consesus and merge the article. Nutiketaiel (talk) 19:30, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or merge per nom. Eusebeus (talk) 04:51, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 05:11, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A Merge should be done before this AfD is closed. Personally, I think it should redirect to Quatre Raberba Winner rather than the List article, since he's the only character who uses the fictional suit in question. JuJube (talk) 11:23, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to a List of Gundams in Gundam Wing 70.55.200.131 (talk) 12:25, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as per 70.55.200.131. The Merge target suggested by Nutiketaiel is for mass-production suits, not Gundams. Edward321 (talk) 23:57, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per Edward321. MalikCarr (talk) 09:08, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to List of Gundam Wing mobile suits with other articles/lists on mobile suits. --Farix (Talk) 13:09, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. A previous AFD established that this article should be merged. As nobody has seen fit to merge it in that time, it is clear that the content is not wanted either at this title nor in a list. Stifle (talk) 08:34, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.