Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gulzaeb Beg Ali
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 16:40, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Gulzaeb Beg Ali (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No significant coverage in reliable independent sources. Seems to fail our guidelines to models, unsourced BLP, suspected vanity COI.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:24, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Modeling accomplishments are nothing special in the least. I can't say much about the TV presenting stuff but to an uninformed reader it doesn't look very impressive. Only one hit in google news, general google brings up a bit more (for example, [1] and [2]) but really not enough to meet WP:N. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:02, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:11, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:12, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan Talk Contributions 00:14, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.