Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gulshan Kumar Bajwa
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Speedy deletion as created by a block-evading editor, with no substantial contributions from anyone else. I have little doubt that the discussion would have ended in deletion anyway, but we may as well save wasting editors' time. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:12, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Gulshan Kumar Bajwa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Note: I am striking comments by three checkuser-confirmed sockpuppets of a blocked editor who has previously edited to promote Gulshan Kumar Bajwa. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:08, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
Not clear how he passes WP:GNG and no independent coverage Theroadislong (talk) 18:16, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 18:37, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 18:37, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 18:37, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 18:37, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable living individual. Fails GNG and also WP:N. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 19:39, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
Keep Notability has been verified & established from Governmental sources cited in the Article and the court-recognised Law Reports which publish Court-Judgments, as also from the Archives of leading National Daily Newspapers like 'Indian Express', 'Times of India', 'Pioneer' etc. --Mudassirbaj (talk) 5:30 8 May 2019 (UTC)Keep As per Government-websites, published Court-Judgments and Archives of leading National Dailies 'notability' of Gulshan Kumar Bajwa is established & verified. Considering the notability of Gulshan Kumar Bajwa, two other 'wikis' have published a Page each on him, e.g. [1] --Pcshejwalkar (talk) 6:53 8 May 2019 (UTC)- Hi @Pcshejwalkar: Everybodywiki is not a reliable source. Even I can have a page there. Also, please read WP:EXIST, and WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 08:30, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
:: @Rsrikanth05: I'm a Professor, and we do not allow our students to rely upon any 'wiki' --Pcshejwalkar (talk) 15:07 8 May 2019 (UTC)- Irrespective of whether you are a professor or a philosopher, if a wiki is not meant to be relied upon then why did you provide a link to one as evidence of notability? --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 11:10, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
Keep I am personally aware that during the 1980s Flt Lt GS Bajwa (alias Gulshan Kumar Bajwa) was talk of the town, hogging headlines on front pages of leading Dailies; and we used to ask for his autographs. His concerns have also been discussed in Indian Parliament, and are part of Parliamentary Debates; in those days electronic digitisation of records was not available and, hence, only hard copies are available now. --Fltltpatil (talk) 8:40 8 May 2019 (UTC)- Comment All three of the above users currently have an open sockpuppet investigation against them. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 06:45, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
Evidence of Notability: It can be given only by a person who is familiar with the 'notable person', and the evidence is to be adduced in a manner that is universally & transparently followed by all adjudicatory authorities (e.g. Courts of Law) -- the same goes for drawing conclusions from 'facts' adduced by those who know the notable person first hand. Hence, the persons whose evidence is legally acceptable should know the notable person first hand; therefore, some of them are likely to know each-other through that notable persons -- if some of those who wish to bring out the truth do not possess electronic tools like computer & internet etc or are not tech-savvy to handle such tools, then they will have to depend upon only the persons whom they know and with whom they share common cause to uphold the Truth. --Pcshejwalkar (talk) 16:15 8 May 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.