Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gulnaz Dadashova

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:32, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gulnaz Dadashova

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is nothing whatsoever that indicates that this scientist is notable. This is one of many extremely poor articles that a ring of editors are importing into the English Wikipedia from the Azerbaijani Wikipedia. Thenightaway (talk) 21:27, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Medicine and Azerbaijan. Owen× ☎ 21:39, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:34, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:34, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:34, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No indication of meeting WP:NPROF. Poor citation counts. May be scope for meeting WP:NAUTHOR if sufficient reviews are found, but I failed to. -Kj cheetham (talk) 17:43, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Indeed, she just seem to authored a few papers, no indication of meeting WP:NPROF or WP:NAUTHOR. My very best wishes (talk) 00:28, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as an associate professor, she fails the PROF test. I don't see anything special that she's done. Lots of medical doctors and physiologists are studying medicines to improve cardiac outcomes for post-menopausal women. Bearian (talk) 19:25, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.