Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gulf States Utilities

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:10, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gulf States Utilities[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough reliable sources to be a standalone article, possibly fails WP:NPOV, and hasn't been updated much. signed, 64andtim (chat) 22:28, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. signed, 64andtim (chat) 22:28, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:06, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no significant coverage in reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject are provided here. Rodgers V (talk) 13:59, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Both the nominator and the discussant are relatively new editors, I hope some editors with more experience can also review this article which was created by a longstanding editor/administrator.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:30, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The only SIRS source I could find was the Texas Handbook source in the article, but that doesn't singlehandedly pass NCORP or GNG, and I cannot find anything else. CLYDE ^{TALK TO ME}/_{STUFF DONE} 00:36, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.