Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gulam Rabbani Abu Bakr

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:31, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gulam Rabbani Abu Bakr[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is a about a name found on a primary source list of 645 names of people hold in Bagram Afghanistan. This source does not tell us anything about this individual apart from the name. This is followed by Andy Worthington's two sentences speculation about who that person might be. The fact is we do not know. Article fails WP:GNG, WP:BIO. Note: Article almost entirely written by one editor. See also Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Geo_Swan IQinn (talk) 07:27, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Subject has not been widely covered by reliable scondary sources, and fails notability requirements.--Yachtsman1 (talk) 14:53, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:23, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:23, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Yachtsman1--Wikireader41 (talk) 01:52, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. A Google search of this name produces nothing but Wikipedia-clones and passing mentions on other websites so notability isn't established. Nick-D (talk) 07:12, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - subject appears to lack "significant independent coverage" in reliable sources. As such its not notable under WP:GNG. Anotherclown (talk) 09:32, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.