Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gulab Singh (Story)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. As no reliable sources have been presented during this discussion, covering the article's subject directly and in detail, the article's subject is found to not be notable. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 10:10, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gulab Singh (Story)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unsourced story written by non-notable author. smileguy91^{Need to talk?} 15:40, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Article creator perhaps made a mistake in mentioning author's name. Author is very well known; Subhadra Kumari Chauhan. Possibly this article might pass but with apt references and clean-up. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 15:52, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

keep if story was written by Subhadra Kumari Chauhan it may meet WP:NBOOK or it could be merged into author article? problem is that nearly all web pages i have found on subhadra talks of her poetry, only 1 mentioned she had written some kids books but didn't list their titles or describe them in any way.

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 14:35, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Maybe an article about the book that included a brief plot summary would work, but this is much too in-depth, unsourced, and fictional for Wikipedia. EoRdE6^{(Come Talk to Me!)} 18:34, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 01:05, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.