Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guillermo López Langarica

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 00:50, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Guillermo López Langarica

Potentially controversial, so I brought to AfD rather than speedy. Happy for others to correct me. Non-notable internet "celebrity" whose death was briefly featured on the news. Deadly∀ssassin 05:25, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are you serious??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ej.valdes (talk • contribs) 05:28, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep - While this article may require cleanup, a simple Google search established the following references (which essentially rule out lack of notability) [1][2][3][4][5]. For a notability guideline re internet celebrities see here: List of YouTube celebrities. Otherwise, I suggest someone with a good grip on Spanish to include some extra citations within the article. --Flewis^(talk) 06:38, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't seem to be a policy or guideline, but just a list of articles that currently exist, which seems to be an Wikipedia:Other stuff exists kind of argument. Why would the previoudly quoted WP:BLP1E not apply to this? --Deadly∀ssassin 01:03, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last time I checked, "Biographies of living persons" don't apply to the deceased. --Flewis^(talk) 03:13, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, but that wording also appears in Notability (People). --Deadly∀ssassin 04:29, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep He seems to have been notable, sad story however. Steve Dufour (talk) 07:30, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

keep With the references found by DeadlyAssassin article meets WP:NB cf38^talk 09:33, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Especially after the new references. --Banime (talk) 13:34, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Presumed Keep taken from the article's talk page - I really don't think this article should be deleted, since there are other lesser YouTube celebrities who have their own articles, and I don't believe someone who made it to most major news anchors and newspapers in Mexico is 'non-important'. In such case, all YouTube celebrities are 'non-important' and should only be named in the YouTube main article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ej.valdes (talk • contribs) 05:32, 20 October 2008 (UTC) (added by Flewis^(talk) 14:23, 20 October 2008 (UTC))[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:45, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:45, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:46, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Just enough sustained RS interest in what happened to him. • Gene93k (talk) 17:01, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Clear case of WP:BLP1E. Will be forgotten in another couple of weeks. --Crusio (talk) 17:07, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See my comment above - this guy is no longer with us. I'm pretty sure that means he won't file a complaint to the wikimedia foundation, requesting that his bio be removed --Flewis^(talk) 03:13, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOT#NEWS and WP:BIO1E, which doesn't only apply to living people. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:56, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.