Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guildford and Woking Alliance League

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 21:14, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Guildford and Woking Alliance League

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another league that is well below the level for presumed notability as per WP:FOOTYN. Absolutely nothing coming up in Google Books, Google Images or Google News on the league. Nothing in ProQuest either. Results in a British newspaper search were all from the same local paper, the Staines & Ashford News. The coverage in that paper was infrequent and had barely any depth to it. Very rarely did it extend beyond a mere listing of results.

Absolutely no evidence that this meets WP:GNG. Similar case to Wakefield and District Football Association League and Wearside Combination Football League, both of which were at a similar level and also had issues with lack of independent coverage. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:14, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:14, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:14, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:14, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:15, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Can't argue with that. JBchrch (talk) 22:13, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. per nom. Low level amateur league. Local interest only. Nigej (talk) 10:21, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 10:30, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom, clearly not notable CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:12, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Doesn't meet notability criteria. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 05:49, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for lack of independent, in-depth coverage StarM 01:43, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.