Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guenoa (disambiguation)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 16:45, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Guenoa (disambiguation)[edit]

Guenoa (disambiguation) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This disambiguation page concerns only two topics: Guenoa and Güenoa language. A disambiguation page is not required because the current primary topic has a hatnote to the other use. A requested move that would have the effect of saying that there is no primary topic (Talk:Guenoa#Requested move 3 January 2021 failed to gain consensus. My PROD was removed by @Uanfala: with edit summary "there's no primary topic here, so I'd rather see this mess sorted by this page getting moved back to the primary title". The two articles are relatively small: there's really no need for a third page about them. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:28, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:28, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:28, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South America-related deletion discussions. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:28, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oh, I had forgotten about that RM. Yes, it closed as "not moved", an outcome that I will obviously respect, but which is unlikely to get repeated in a future nomination unless it happens to be attended by the same unusual sample of participants with extreme views. If the dab page is deleted in the meantime, that's not a big loss as it can easily get recreated. – Uanfala (talk) 15:40, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete. This qualifies as a WP:G14 deletion as a dab page with only one other use besides the primary topic.--Cúchullain t/c 15:56, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • See WP:G14: Disambiguation pages that have titles ending in "(disambiguation)" but disambiguate only one extant Wikipedia page. The page under consideration disambiguates between two and four pages (depending on how you count), which is greater than one. – Uanfala (talk) 16:01, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete pointless and useless dab page. —В²C 16:21, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: the hatnotes at Guenoa do all that's needed to get every reader to their destination. This AfD simply confirms the 3 Jan Move Request which received one support and three opposes. PamD 08:41, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above. Riteboke (talk) 08:13, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.