Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guatemala–Belize Language Exchange Project

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 00:59, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Guatemala–Belize Language Exchange Project[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertising. Any article on this topic would have to be rewritten anyway. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:30, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Advertising can be fixed by editing—I've made a start by removing contact details and irrelevant information about where contents of the subject's web site have been moved—and the article wouldn't need complete rewriting if kept, as some of the content is perfectly acceptable, so the nominator's concerns are not valid reasons for deletion. The problems not identified by the nominator are that the article doesn't give a clear explanation of what this project actually was, but just leaps straight into describing who ran it and funded it, and that there are no independent sources. A few such sources can be found here: I'll leave it to others to decide whether there are enough for notability. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:54, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Guatemala-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:48, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:59, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:56, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, non-notable organization. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:35, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
delete, interesting and useful organization, but no hint of notability for wikipedia L.tak (talk) 21:28, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.