Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grzegorz Michalski (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 20:45, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Grzegorz Michalski (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The described person clearly fails to meet notability criteria for scholars and the professor test. He is an assistant professor at a good Polish university and one day may very well be notable on en-wiki. However, for now and within the current guidelines and by established consensus, he is not notable by a wide margin. Apart from typical criteria, he is a non-tenured scholar, and has not published any international books.
Previously, after an AfD on this entry, it was speedy deleted because of the copyvio (after a discussion also clearly indicating that the person is not notable). Now this is not the case, so a consensus should be reached on the notability of this bio. Comments are appreciated. Pundit|utter 08:45, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —Pundit|utter 08:47, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I agree with the nominator. Far too early. Xxanthippe (talk) 10:08, 18 March 2010 (UTC).[reply]
- Comment There are other Grzegorz Michalski (George Michaels) in Poland showing up in the searches. Abductive (reasoning) 04:08, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not enough to satisfy WP:PROF. CronopioFlotante (talk) 18:42, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. There is a !vote at the first nomination page. CronopioFlotante (talk) 18:45, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I moved it here, just below. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:40, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- We have diffrent 4 Grzegorz Michalski persons in Poland:
- economist (Wrocław, Wroclaw University of Economics)
- musicologist (Warszawa, Chopinist)
- 2 others from medicine and work with childs
- Here is disscossion about the first: Grzegorz Michalski (economist from Wroclaw), he is known in any places and holds positions in editorial boards
- Journal of Corporate Treasury Management (JCTM) [1],
- Business and Economics Journal (BEJ) [2],
- Journal of Problems and Perspectives in Management (PPM) [3],
- International Review of Applied Financial Issues and Economics (IRAFIE) [4],
- International Journal of Economics and Business Research (IJEBR) [5].
- if you take the ISBN links, you find his books
- if you take his name in JCR you can find his works in Journal Citation Reports publications
- locally in Eastern Europe his work in financial liquidity management has its own impact - I am against deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.42.40.207 (talk) 17:21, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi, you are editing from Poland, from the similar address range as the editor of the Polish entry, so it seems you know the topic well. Still, all the things that you wrote above are in no way connected to notability criteria for scholars on en-wiki. I actually believe that these criteria are a bit too tight. I also voted in favor of keeping Michalski on Polish Wikipedia in the current AfD debate there (as according to Polish rules he rather qualifies, even though the votes are not unanimous). Nevertheless, on en-wiki this person clearly fails to fulfill the current requirements. If at least he was at something corresponding to tenured professor post, or had at least a couple of quotations (people citing his works) in decent journals it could be a different story. Pundit|utter 20:54, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.