Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grupo Senda

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:00, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Grupo Senda

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is not about the tone, which could be cleaned up as it's not bad enough to be a G11. However, I looked for sourcing in English and Spanish and I find only routine churnalism. Nothing to establish organizational notability on which to build an article. Star Mississippi 19:21, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 19:21, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 19:21, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 19:21, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 19:21, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Company involved in a controversy ([1], part 1, part 2) still ongoing four years after a deadly crash. I also found this. Searching is made harder as there is a Brazillian supermarket called "Grupo Sendas", but I think there is enough coverage. NemesisAT (talk) 19:56, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:00, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:51, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.