Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grorudalen Optical Observatory

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of observatory codes#200–299. Overall consensus is to redirect (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 01:42, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Grorudalen Optical Observatory[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Small-time observatory with only some geocities websites to even show that it exists. Does not appear to meet GNG. Primefac (talk) 03:00, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The observatory has gotten some credit in scientific journals. Unfortunately there are simply no reliable sources available that can verify the information in the article, or that someone could use to improve it. DPRoberts534 (talk) 05:36, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Instead of deleting the article should be expanded and improved. Davidbuddy9 (talk) 15:45, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Davidbuddy9, how, and with what information? Primefac (talk) 03:25, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, reluctantly. I can't find anything of substance. -- Elmidae (talk) 14:27, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

-> Redirect, following reasoning below; seems the better option.-- Elmidae (talk) 06:17, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 14:43, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to "List of observatory codes#200–299" where it is already listed. Praemonitus (talk) 22:08, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to "List of observatory codes#200–299" where it is already listed. Basic info, like observatory code and country in which it is located, is verifiable, so redirect seems fine to me. --Mark viking (talk) 23:10, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.