Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grok Learning

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 16:05, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Grok Learning[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

COI article about a company/website sourced only by its own website & staff profiles at their relevant universities. A search only returns their own website and social media posts. Fails WP:NCORP. Cabayi (talk) 10:45, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 10:46, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 10:46, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 10:46, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, fails WP:GNG as it lacks significant and independent coverage outside of its own website. Omni Flames (talk) 11:11, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I'm finding some mentions in books [1], [2], but nothing that really indicates it is of encyclopedic noteworthiness. This looks like a promotional article created shortly after the company was launched. SunChaser (talk) 00:13, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.