Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GridGain Systems

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:02, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Liz,

I would like to ask if this page could be reinstated, please, in order to remove any promotional language and provide published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject.

Thanks so much for this consideration!

Katherine ByeByeNYC (talk) 00:20, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GridGain Systems[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

They do not show significant coverage about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Page is clearly created for promotion. Page creator's edits on Wikipedia promote this company. Daringsmith (talk) 16:23, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:34, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:34, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:34, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:34, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:35, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:35, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or merge. I tried to work on this in 2016, but it appears single-purpose account Special:Contributions/Tdieds1945 added some more promotion, and spun off an entirely new Apache Ignite article on the technology. Then various editors removed more of the promotion, resulting in, well not much. Certainly not enough to justify two articles, so I would say remove this one or redirect it to Apache Ignite. W Nowicki (talk) 23:24, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any merge targets?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:58, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It definitely doesn't meet WP:NCORP, as there are very few articles that are reliable and independent. I don't think that there are any good articles that it can be merged/redirected to. >>> Wgullyn.talk(); 01:19, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.