Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greyseason Research
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 03:07, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Greyseason Research[edit]
More deletion patrol - this time tagged with the speedy
- non-notable, 8 google hits
No opinion WhiteNight T | @ | C 07:42, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Too secret. I was going to remove the speedy tag and nominate this myself, but you beat me to it. The following line is nice: "This firm has operated quitely and in the dark the past five years; purposely avoiding many search engines due to the sensitivity of some of its research." Since the firm has now apparently decided to operate "loudly and in the light", they should continue to do so for a little longer before they warrant a Wikipedia article. --Deathphoenix 07:46, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- From the original author. Cleaned it up with more details. I have to get permission from some people to link & make connections to some of the misc papers that have been published by some of the employees. Non-disclosure stuff... Let me know if there's anything else that would help. Update Might be able to get pictures of the Veritas box.69.22.45.103 18:30, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Stub Request May I request this topic become a stub (if I'm understanding this process right) until I have all of my verifiable data together. Understandably I can see the verification issues; however it is not a hoax, the company is just highly discrete. I would like to be able to properly pull together sources and cite papers. Waiting for the firm's new site to go up would help too. If this option is not possible I completely understand the need for deletion. 69.22.45.103 18:30, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as unverified and possibly a hoax. Only registers 4 google hits all from a forum type sites [1]. No information available at thier webpage [2]. Movementarian 13:09, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as too secret (i.e. unverifiable). —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-02 21:43Z
- Delete unverifiable. Stifle 02:25, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete very low google hit and no Patent hits Rjayres 19:47, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.