Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gretta Boley

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 23:11, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gretta Boley[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:ACADEMIC. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:31, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:49, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:49, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:49, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:49, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete heads of national forests are not notable for such. An announcement of someone being even a key-note speaker at some meeting or conference is not a show of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:37, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agreeing with the above, there also does not seem to be enough coverage on her from reliable sources. Coolcactus04 (talk) 18:22, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I found a few dozen mentions in Newspaper.Com articles, and she looks to be supervising Mississippi's national forests since 2008 and is quoted occasionally in that role as late as 2017. There may be more to find, but keeping someone's PTE sockpuppet project alive doesn't motivate me to want to make the effort. No hard-to-find sources will be lost if this is deleted. BBQboffin (talk) 23:45, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I do not see how this subject meets the basic criteria for notability of people per WP:BASIC nor any of the expanded criteria per WP:ANYBIO. There must be countless public servants managing national parks of significance in the U.S. and across the world, only those with sufficient notability would be suitable for inclusion. A reference to the supervisor could be made in the national park she supervises. Alternative to deletion, a redirect could be created to this article. I did not vote for a redirect as my primary option as this individual is so insufficiently notable it is inherently unlikely that individuals would be searching for the subject's name and so a redirect whilst possible is not necessary. Such-change47 (talk) 02:20, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG. -Kj cheetham (talk) 10:21, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above fails WP:GNG and WP:ACADEMIC.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:09, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.