Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grendel R31

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Grendel R31

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Pretty much all results for a search are brief hobbyist forums, and a couple entries in lists of auotomatic rifles. Appears to be mentioned in The Gun Digest Book of Guns for Personal Defense, but I can't access that. My guess is that even that mention is a brief aside, but even granting it substantive coverage that's only one source. Rusalkii (talk) 08:08, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Firearms-related deletion discussions. Rusalkii (talk) 08:08, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:24, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Can't seem to find any secondary, reliable sources. Doesn't meet WP:NPRODUCT. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 17:52, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. Skynxnex (talk) 19:26, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.