Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grenada–South Korea relations (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 03:40, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Grenada–South Korea relations

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Grenada–South Korea relations
• Articles for deletion/Grenada–South Korea relations (2nd nomination)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Grenada–South Korea relations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Last AfD was no consensus. fails WP:GNG. There is very limited relations between the countries. one very minor visa waiver agreement no embassies and no state visits. LibStar (talk) 00:12, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:17, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:17, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Grenada-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:17, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
• Delete Per lack of significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Not seeing anything that actually discusses this topic in any sort of depth. Yilloslime (talk) 21:18, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
• Delete - absolutely no reason why this would be included in an encyclopaedia, which to me is the ultimate question of whether an article should stay or go. If there are no sources, it does not belong here Such-change47 (talk) 08:52, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.