Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gregory Sica
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:50, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Gregory Sica (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Only a single EL and no references, otherwise this would be a CSD BLP candidate. No indication of notability. Fails WP:GNG. UtherSRG (talk) 11:47, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism, Football, and Australia. UtherSRG (talk) 11:47, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Unreferenced for 16 years. Possible WP:PROMO. LibStar (talk) 11:52, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:26, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 19:49, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - No evidence of notability. Seems promotional. JTtheOG (talk) 01:27, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 10:59, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.