Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gregg Hart

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:28, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gregg Hart

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not able to find any significant coverage to suggest notability. Topic is unlikely to pass WP:NSPORT. ––FormalDude (talk) 07:41, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Sportspeople, Olympics, and Indiana. ––FormalDude (talk) 07:41, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Passes NCOLLATH as someone who has Have won multiple NCAA Division I national championships as an individual in an individual sport. BeanieFan11 (talk) 15:47, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
SIGCOV at [1]. BeanieFan11 (talk) 15:49, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

More coverage: here. BeanieFan11 (talk) 15:51, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I feel like there has to be more coverage on someone who was runner-up in the NCAA national championship and set a high school national record, but unfortunately that was all I could find. BeanieFan11 (talk) 15:56, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I cannot name a single discus thrower and I do not believe most people can either. Would I if it was featured as much on TV during primetime like College Football is? Probably. Coming in 2nd and 3rd place nationally in your sport indicates notability. KatoKungLee (talk) 16:59, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
According to WP:NOLYMPICS you need to have won a medal for notability to be assumed. ––FormalDude (talk) 02:12, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, ~~no SIGCOV~~ only one piece of local maybe-SIGCOV has been found despite searches. JoelleJay (talk) 00:45, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say the piece from The Indianapolis Star is likely SIGCOV. BeanieFan11 (talk) 02:49, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it's ok but I give considerably less weight to quote-heavy articles where much of the non-quote bits are still not independent secondary analysis (e.g. reporting what Hart "felt" or summarizing what he said in a quote prior to giving the quote), especially when it's local-interest media. JoelleJay (talk) 03:20, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not enough WP:SIGCOV to establish notability. The Indianapolis Star piece is a start but that alone doesn't get it across the finish line for GNG. Please ping me if more coverage is found. Frank Anchor 20:26, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.