Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Mathew (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete both. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:43, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Greg Mathew[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of any real notability other than having been a Big Brother contestant. No evidence of any notability as an individual in any case - indeed, David Mathew is almost an exact duplicate. As such, even if it isn't deleted, we should at least merge them into Greg and David Mathew or similar. Smjg (talk) 16:33, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related page:

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both. They're already covered under Big Brother Australia 2005 and are not otherwise notable. . Jimmy Pitt talk 20:11, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both. Not notable, poorly sourced, and only deserves mention in another related article. Cresix (talk) 19:55, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both. simply appearing on big brother doesn't warrant a separate article. LibStar (talk) 14:43, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.