Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Hyde
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:37, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Greg Hyde[edit]
- Greg Hyde (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 06:03, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:33, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:33, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:33, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Very little coverage and all of it WP:ROUTINE. Fails GNG. Certainly fails NHOCKEY with no experience in an established, well-covered league (has only played in amateur leagues). Played in the second tier of the IIHF championships, but that is only for promotion and relegation. Did not play for The World Championship which is only in the top division. Yosemiter (talk) 17:21, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 12:14, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 12:14, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Only routine sports coverage and playing in the lower tiers of IIHF championships does not meet WP:NHOCKEY. Papaursa (talk) 17:44, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.