Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Brockman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 00:31, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Greg Brockman

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable, part of an apparent promotional campaign for the company. Refs are the typical combination of articles about the company, and announcements. Whether the company itself is notable is a separate question. DGG ( talk ) 01:06, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delete - it's hard to go through all these refs and find - almost nothing- maybe one use of the word "Brockman", but no in-depth coverage of him. This is the first time I've seen Flickr used as a ref - but it is clearly not a reliable source. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 01:27, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
delete Obvious lack of independent coverage. Even the ref to Forges is self-published by Bkockman. Staszek Lem (talk) 02:07, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. ~Awilley (talk) 02:10, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for all the reasons cited above. To me, this is obviously an instance of self-promotion. Chisme (talk) 02:32, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 03:39, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 03:39, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 03:39, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I see nothing convincingly better. SwisterTwister talk 03:40, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.