Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greenhouse Construction Services

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SNOW. Obvious case for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 18:33, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Greenhouse Construction Services

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a greenhouse construction company with no coverage in independent reliable sources that I can find to establish notability. There are some directory listings that show when searching but that does not meet the sourcing need to establish notability. Whpq (talk) 22:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - You beat me to the nomination. Ignoring the obvious COI, I can say this article has nothing by way of WP:CORPDEPTH and therefore fails WP:ORG. Declined speedy a shot time ago. --CNMall41 (talk) 22:43, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. I originally tagged it WP:A7 then found that it had been previosly tagged for speedy deletion but declined. -- Whpq (talk) 22:45, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Whpq: I am trying to WP:AGF, but this is one of many by the same creator. It appears they moved to draft space, only to move the article back to main space once they removed the speedy tag. --CNMall41 (talk) 22:52, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

He's actually been moving it in and out of draft space repeatedly in an effort to hide the article, it seems, from deletion. The banner tells us we have to take this Draft article to MFD, but if we do I daresay he'll move it back to article space. There are two warnings on his usertalk page and he's got a raft of Pezzin surname-related articles up for speedy deletion. When he tries and remove those tags, please revert and issue the necessary warnings and we can have him blocked. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:35, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:35, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's also frankly nuts because Dpezzin's disruptive edits here in an effort to preserve his spam articles on the Pezzin family and their firm are hardly the kind of online practices that engender trust. So if you're D Pezzin or one of his relations or are employed by Greenhouse Construction Services, you might want to take him aside and tell him to cut this out, for the sake of your own family's reputation. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:52, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and actually speedy delete as there is absolutely no claim of significance or notability and is clearly promotional. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 00:52, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:54, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete under company A7; article makes no claim to notability, and only reference is to company's website. MereTechnicality ⚙ 01:49, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails any notability guideline, and as mentioned above, seems to be one of the unnecessary article creations by D Pezzin Adamtt9 (talk) 01:55, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I did detag it at one point, after wondering why an admin had tagged a Draft as A7. A quick look in the history told me it had been moved from article space, which explained that. There has been a spate of Pezzin related articles, but I can see possible notability for John Pezzin, but that's only a single event thing. This one would have been deleted by me had it not been in Draft space. This is a firm that puts up greenhouses. Good for them. I could do with a new one myself, but I'll be looking on my side of the Atlantic as delivery costs would be a bit high from Colorado to the UK. Peridon (talk) 09:41, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Just to explain the speedy deletion thing, Dpezzin had discovered that while he couldn't remove speedy tags himself, he could get them removed by moving his walled garden articles on his family members and his company in and out of Draft space -- as well-meaning editors would follow guidelines and remove the speedy tags while it was in draft. That's the only reason why this speedy deletion was declined. Later on, that stopped working, as we recognized what was going on and started simply reverting such page moves as disruptive editing. And it's why he's been blocked for 24 hours. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:27, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete Fails WP:ORG.Theroadislong (talk) 12:40, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- Fails notability criteria for WP:ORG. @Peridon:, Yes, I figured that was what happened when I returned and found the tag had been removed. I had already speedy deleted several of their tagged articles and decided to tag the rest. But after I left, they moved them into Draft space, nullifying the CSD tags. Glad to see the block. I've dropped a personal note on their page to give them a chance to discuss the issues. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 16:35, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.