Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greenhithe Catimba Football Club

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per WP:WITHDRAWN. (non-admin closure) NZFC^(talk) 21:02, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Greenhithe Catimba Football Club[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG and doesn't have enough for WP:GNG. I proposed deletion but tag was removed without reason. User who created page only contacted me about name of club not why notable. Page is basically a blurb and unsourced Team list. NZFC^(talk) 05:08, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:13, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:13, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:13, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhkohh (talk) 13:33, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Question Does Chatham Cup participation not count wrt WP:FOOTYN? Nzd (talk) 07:26, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have this discussion with someone before about clubs meeting notability requirements because they play in a National Cup and was told they are guidelines only, they still need to meet WP:ORG. So appears to be conflicting requirements for sports clubs. One thing I will say is any team that is associated with NZ football can enter the cup as long as they pay the fee. So do feel it would be very broad to allow it in this case even though I wouldn't mind seeing another Nz clubs page on Wikipedia (though this page would still need a clean up). NZFC^(talk) 07:40, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say playing in the Chatham Cup is notable - but where is the evidence? Giant Snowman 12:26, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Nzd (talk) 00:44, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Has participated in the Chatham cup, meets FOOTYN. Smartyllama (talk) 13:59, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 18:05, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Meets FOOTYN by virtue of Chatham Cup participation. Nzd (talk) 20:07, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I'm withdrawing my nomination as it appears that you can use Chatham Cup to meet WP:NFOOTYN clubs meet notability requirements because they play in a National Cup. NZFC^(talk) 21:02, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.