Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greenacres Shopping Centre

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, though I'm open to a re-creation discussion if someone wants to show additional sources etc. Mojo Hand (talk) 14:15, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greenacres Shopping Centre (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mall of approx 26,037m2 retail space, not big enough based on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Common outcomes. Not finding a lot of Reliable sources, most searches are promotional. Orphaned since 2009, nothing links here anyway Gbawden (talk) 13:13, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:53, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:53, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Soft delete  The information seen in the snippets from WP:BEFORE D1, Google images, and the information removed from this article after the start of the AfD, [1], show that this is a wp:notable regional mall.  However, the only source in the article is a primary source which is giving a 404 error.  So the article fails WP:V and lacks a champion to keep it up to date.  Both of these problems are remediable, and Soft delete allows the article to be restored at WP:REFUND.  Unscintillating (talk) 00:00, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, generally speaking there are reasons why most malls and shopping centers are not notable. This mall exemplifies some of them: small, locally important, but seemingly not for the Eastern Cape, and lacking independent coverage other than PRs. The types of sources decried at WP:CORPDEPTH are the type that are used to try an shore-up support for keeping a mall, for example see this promo piece by a related real estate company. This topic fails WP:GNG. --Bejnar (talk) 15:29, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.