Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Green Capital

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 10:40, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Green Capital

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG. References are either self-published, promotional, or directory listings. ubiquity (talk) 16:21, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, there are mainly promotional sources listed here. As expressed by the nom, this article should be deleted unless someone is willing to find other non promotional sources. At this point this article is not notable enough to be here. --CyberWarfare (talk) 16:31, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as the sourcing could be better and my searches found nothing outstandingly good. SwisterTwister talk 18:50, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I prodded it before I realized it is here. What a nice surprise. Spam, fails NCOMPANY, burn. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:50, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:19, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:19, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I concur. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 03:28, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.