Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greatshot

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 00:06, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Greatshot[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable and obscure fictional character. Delete. NotARealWord (talk) 16:00, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or Merge to Transformers:_Victory#Sixchanger if no good citations can be added. Mathewignash (talk) 16:09, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:42, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no real sources cited, no evidence of real-world notability. J Milburn (talk) 23:13, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into the Transformers G1 character list when the list is created from the mergers of other G1 characters. —Farix (t | c) 22:38, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- When dealing with non-notable character articles, it is always preferable to look for a list or to create one to merge the article into, or merge/redirect them to the main article instead of outright deletion. Only in cases where the character is completely incidental should it be deleted. Also, how the page is currently organizes shows the folly of trying to cover more than one character from different series that happen to share the same name. —Farix (t | c) 17:49, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No real-world notability asserted for a fictional character. Tarc (talk) 02:12, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no verifiable information to merge. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:00, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no third-party sources that can WP:verify notability of this topic. Shooterwalker (talk) 19:40, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.