Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greater Albion Typefounders

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lourdes 06:56, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Greater Albion Typefounders[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Cited sources are either primary sources, minor references or from company descriptions on font marketplaces (1 is a dead link). Lack of significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. Samuel Wiki (talk) 00:30, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 00:48, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 00:48, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 00:48, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a promotional page for a company, for which no independent RS were found in a search.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 00:55, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I too could not see any IRS. Aoziwe (talk) 11:34, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No reliable sources. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 22:55, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Promotional and no reputable sources. Hughesdarren (talk) 11:14, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.