Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Great Sioux Nation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Sioux. $Salvio giuliano$ 19:44, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Great Sioux Nation[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page is just duplicate information of the main Sioux page and the term is an outdated way of referring to all the Lakota and Dakota people (Oceti Sakowin is the proper native way to refer to the entire people). The Great Sioux Reservation article exists and presents information different from the main article Sioux. So this page should be deleted and redirected to one of the two articles, I suggest Sioux but either is fine. TLDR: Delete and merge per WP:OVERLAP. oncamera _{(talk page)} 18:19, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:33, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and United States of America. Curbon7 (talk) 19:21, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to Sioux. Per nom. and WP:OVERLAP. Sal2100 (talk) 21:32, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have posted a link to this discussion at WT:IPNA's talk page. CT55555(talk) 02:52, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. This is an important issue to get right, and I am trying to balance my lack of expertise with the perception that the nominator seems well-qualified to comment, which makes me somewhere between neutral and lean delete. CT55555(talk) 02:55, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I asked before and the admin there said merge, straight forward. I just didn't see their reply until today when I remembered I posted on there after you mentioned it here. See archived discussion post

oncamera _{(talk page)} 12:43, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect to Sioux as Sal2100 notes. Historyday01 (talk) 17:34, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to Sioux as per all of the above would be the best solution. TH1980 (talk) 00:15, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.