Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Great Dale

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of regions in Faerûn. (non-admin closure) f e minist 03:42, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Great Dale

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article fails to establish notability. TTN (talk) 20:29, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 20:30, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or merge to List of regions in Faerûn. BOZ (talk) 20:53, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:55, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It does appear in book cites like this. Redirect and merge to List of regions in Faerûn. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:59, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Forgotten Realms. Nothing to merge as the article content is entirely "in universe" and it does not cite any 3rd party sources. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:16, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per BOZ and WP:ATD-M. I'll note that K.e.coffman's opinion is not policy based, in that primary sources are perfectly acceptable to verify uncontroversial content; they just don't count towards notability. Jclemens (talk) 05:12, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.