Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graphmatech
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:55, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Graphmatech (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article currently just an infobox and one sentence (which is a COPYVIO from the company's website) with no sources. I've searched for sources online, and found some rehashed press releases, blog posts, and routine mentions in business directories, but nothing that would satisfy CORPDEPTH. Fails WP:NCORP. GirthSummit (blether) 21:18, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. GirthSummit (blether) 21:18, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. GirthSummit (blether) 21:18, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. GirthSummit (blether) 21:18, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. GirthSummit (blether) 21:18, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. GirthSummit (blether) 21:18, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 23:02, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 23:02, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Per nominator, pretty clearly fails WP:NCORP. I believe it could be notable in the future, but wikipedia is not a crystal ball. I've removed the copyvio. 💵Money💵emoji💵💸 15:13, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.