Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grapes of Rad
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Ben Roy. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:26, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
Grapes of Rad[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Grapes of Rad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails the general notability guideline. Initially tagged for speedy. SoWhy declined, citing this Huffington Post article. Taking a closer look, this article appears to be talking about a comedy show in Denver with the same name as the podcast. The best source I could find in later searches was this. Not enough to establish notability. TeraTIX 04:53, 18 August 2018 (UTC) SoWhy rightfully pointed out that the article could be redirected to Ben Roy, who worked on the Denver show. TeraTIX 12:36, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Delete as per nomination Mccapra (talk) 08:47, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. TeraTIX 04:57, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Comment: looking at the page history there appears to have been substantial conflict of interest editing. TeraTIX 04:59, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:22, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 02:11, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 02:11, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Nom shifted to relist, so a current split redirect/delete. As Mccapra !voted "per nom" it would be helpful to confirm whether remaining delete
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 21:09, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
Relisting comment: Nom shifted to relist, so a current split redirect/delete. As Mccapra !voted "per nom" it would be helpful to confirm whether remaining delete
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 21:09, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
- CommentHi I don’t really follow the case for redirect here and don’t really see how it would help a reader much, so still prefer delete, but won’t die in a ditch over it.Mccapra (talk) 21:36, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.