Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grant Kay (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 22:12, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Grant Kay[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was merged to Tampa Bay Rays minor league players when nom'd for deletion in 2014, as that page is a repository for "not yet notable" prospects. Now, he's playing for independent baseball teams, with little chance of meeting WP:NBASE, and in spite of those few links I put in the 2014 AfD, he does not appear to meet WP:GNG either. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:19, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:19, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nebraska-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:19, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not even close to meeting notability guidelines for baseball players.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:42, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:46, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete: I don't think he meets GNG (and certainly doesn't meet NBASEBALL), but I did want to point out the best sources I did find. Probably passing mentions, but worth flagging nonetheless: [1] [2] [3] Go Phightins! 21:07, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable minor league baseball player, the sources found appear to be routine coverage (especially the blog). SportingFlyer T·C 22:28, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Can't see enough coverage available to pass for GNG. GooeyMitch (talk) 16:35, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No reliable sources, no evidence of notability. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 11:18, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.