Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grandayy (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ST47 (talk) 03:55, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Grandayy[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, passing mentions only. Kleuske (talk) 08:04, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I love the YouTuber, and watch his videos regularly, however, look for more sources. I'm not giving a delete, mainly because it has more than enough info, it just needs to be backed up with verified sources. Cheesy McGee (talk) 08:35, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The situation has not changed since the last AFD in January and I therefore vote keep for the same reasons. FOARP (talk) 08:37, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. 94rain ^Talk 10:44, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. 94rain ^Talk 10:44, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Malta-related deletion discussions. 94rain ^Talk 10:44, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. —Lafayette Baguette ^talk 13:20, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Only one thing has changed since the last discussion: a sockpuppet who voted "keep" has been found and blocked. My argument stays the same: there is no significant coverage about Grandayy that is not written by him. wumbolo ^^^ 22:44, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as has significant coverage in multiple reliable sources such as The Times of Malta and the Independent as identified in the last AFD and therefore passes WP:GNG and also has a major claim of significance of being Malta's most popular youtuber, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 16:07, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Seems like the question here might be if there is "significant coverage in multiple reliable sources".
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:45, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:30, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not pass our guidelines for musicians.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:14, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

To state the bleeding obvious: this is not an article about a musician. FOARP (talk) 14:54, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: coverage is minimal. If one publication is enough, we will run out of server space. No, not notable. BTW the article is seriously problematic, and "music producer" is unproven. Drmies (talk) 22:52, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 01:05, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.