Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grand Theft Auto: Double Pack

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Redirect' to Grand Theft Auto (series) Computerjoe 's talk 18:06, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Grand Theft Auto: Double Pack[edit]

This page contains no information that isn't already on Grand Theft Auto III or Grand Theft Auto: Vice City. The fact these two games were bundled together isn't notable enough to warrant its own article. Ace of Sevens 03:16, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. Ace of Sevens 03:17, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. It isnt a distinct game, it does not need a distinct article. Resolute 05:24, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It's not its own game, so this article is not needed. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 05:37, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Grand Theft Auto (series). Redirects are cheap. Oldelpaso 08:49, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Wouldnt it be a better idea to mention on each article something like "this game can now be purchased as part of a double pack with ???? (Neostinker 11:11, 1 July 2006 (UTC))[reply]
Delete, but mention "GTA: Double Pack" and "GTA: The Trilogy" (which was later released on XBox only containing all three 3D GTA games) in the appropriate articles. There's no content these articles even could have that wouldn't exist elsewhere. My god, I'm voting delete on a "Grand Theft Auto"-related article? I must not be feeling well. Like, seriously. I've played "Liberty City Stories" for the PS2 for 30 hours over the past 10 or so days. I played "San Andreas" for about 200 hours. Is this possible- a deletion vote? -- Kicking222 12:37, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Grand Theft Auto (series). At least have some reference to it. +Falcon9x5 12:50, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Grand Theft Auto (series), and mention on the GTA3 and vice city pages that they were bundled together in the double pack. --Samael775 17:36, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete NNBB6listcruft. Ste4k 19:46, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Grand Theft Auto (series) (redirects are cheap) and mention on the two game articles that they were bundled together. BryanG^(talk) 03:13, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
What the heck? Keep. SushiGeek 18:31, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect since no other article could possibly conflict with the name, and just list it under another article or two. I'm not sure if I see anything to establish notability -- hell, the double pack isn't even available anymore, and the triple pack which replaced it doesn't seem to have an article. Luna Santin 07:34, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The article is well-written enough and has an interesting section on the porting process. It wouldn't do any harm to keep it. -Robmods 20:42, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.