Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grand Prix Race Manager (Game)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 05:04, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Grand Prix Race Manager (Game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable game that has been in production since 2001. Product has not yet been released and is due sometime in 2010 (according to the article) but according to http://www.gprm.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=94&Itemid=41 there is no set release date. Currently the game does not have a publisher, see link above. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 12:44, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Google web search returns lots of hits related to this, apparently well-established product, but as far as I can see none about the subject of the current article. Favonian (talk) 13:44, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (Search video game sources) • Gene93k (talk) 18:24, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete Projects like this promise the earth and more often than not deliver buttski, WP is absolutely the wrong place for them. A search for the game's name plus the developer reveals a mighty 4 results. No, thankyou. Someoneanother 21:35, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete. No reliable sources found. No ascertation on notability. Half-ads, half-peacock phrases. No actual development info. — Hellknowz ▎talk 15:29, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per lack of verifiability here. We're not a crystal ball. –MuZemike 13:06, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.