Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grameen Foundation Australia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 15:26, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Grameen Foundation Australia[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to pass our notability guidelines for organisations: I can only find a bit of independent coverage of it here. Created by a single-purpose account. doomgaze (talk) 10:39, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - there seem to be a number of references by other non-profits who have received funding or grants or aid in kind from this organisation. --Whiteguru (talk) 08:49, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:12, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 07:33, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:ORG. 1 gnews hit [1]. LibStar (talk) 01:25, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:12, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - this can be dealt with perfectly well at Grameen Bank#Related ventures and/or Grameen family of organizations. Blue Square Thing (talk) 09:02, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.