Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graino, California

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 19:56, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Graino, California

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Graino, California (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The short, contrived name suggests a rail spot, and that's indeed what it is. Regulatory records mention a Graino Warehouse Co. (address in nearby Grimes) and discuss a loading facility at Graino, which his consistent with the topos. But there's no sign of a town, and there's not even a public road to the place, which lies between a orchard and farm fields. Mangoe (talk) 16:16, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:05, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:05, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

• DeleteNo evidence this was ever a community. Hog Farm _Bacon 00:42, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 00:39, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

• Delete - Note to any closer tempted to relist: look at the many, many, many other AFDs that are related to the same author using the same sources (GNIS/Durham - GNIS is a bad source, Durham might be a good source but the person who created these articles is simply ignoring how Durham describes them) to create WP:GEOLAND failing articles during the same period in 2009 and ask whether this really needs another week. FOARP (talk) 12:31, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.