Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graham Dalby

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:07, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Graham Dalby[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:GNG, WP:NBIO, and fails WP:SPIP. Article contains no sources, and looks professionally written by a paid source (Jane grierson). Also in breach of WP:COI as it has recently been edited by Gramjames who the article is about, therefore WP:NOTPROMO and WP:COI may also apply. Wes Wolf ^Talk 19:21, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:32, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:32, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Really, the only section within the article is about his career, and nothing more? Yeah, not notable at all. --Z L Media 23:57, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: That the creator has been blocked for sock-puppeteering (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gramjames). Therefore this may now qualify for speedy delete under WP:G5 criteria. Wes Wolf ^Talk 16:13, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.