Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graem Whyte

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep based on improved sourcing. RL0919 (talk) 22:04, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Graem Whyte

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable sculptor. Article lacks reliable independent sources. Mccapra (talk) 21:47, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 21:47, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 21:47, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I was surprised to find sources for this artist. I found him profiled in ART21, which is significant. A few other sources are decent. Note that "Popp's Packing" refers to the business operating his home studio business, which also includes several adjacent pieces of land with ongoing projects (e.g. "popp's Packing", a gallery/storefront). He is all about the relational aesthetics.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 23:14, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sourcing has significantly improved. There is now independent reporting on Whyte (and Lerman). It is published in reliable sources, and specifically about their work. Vexations (talk) 11:51, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep WP:SIGCOV by Art:21, Hyperallergic and The Detroit News means it passes WP:GNG. I haven't investigated coverage of his works enough, but a little bit of looking suggests it potentially also passes WP:ARTIST. -Lopifalko (talk) 17:20, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:HEY. Passes WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG.4meter4 (talk) 02:34, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.