Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gracie
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:52, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Memorial article about a 6 month old dog. An earlier speedy as a non-notable bio has been contested, so it has been brought here. Delete as per Wikipedia is not a memorial. In addition the article has issues with Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Reliable sources as the only available source is a personal website. --Allen3 talk 14:29, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
As the author of this article i assume i shant be taken objectively, however- Gracie was not just a dog. She was a cultural symbol and a tool for parvo awareness. I believe the speedy deletion as a bio did not take these facts into consideration. I shall attempt to address the other issues, but that is the reason for my reposting. User: Coinman
- Comment. If this is the mascot for Parvovirus why don't they link together in anyway? joshbuddytalk 15:21, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I guess I get concerned when a Google search for ""caught being cute" gracie", which should bring up results for the "infamous" posters or at least something about the campaign, yields only 2 results, both the user's only source. Heck, a search for "gracie parvo" brings up more results for other dogs than for this one. --Maxamegalon2000 16:12, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails Google Test. Hynca-Hooley 16:31, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Aparently not even the only Gracie to die of cannine parvo [1]. This seems nn bio to me. joshbuddytalk 16:32, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:BIO since there isn't a WP:PETS. This is the 3rd poochie AfD I've seen in a couple of weeks. If these sorts of articles increase, maybe we need to discuss animal notability criteria. If perchance this is kept it is in dire need of cleanup.--Isotope23 17:43, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as rather unverifiable, and likely non-notable per a pets extension of WP:BIO. --Kinu t/c 18:33, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Im deleting it- as i cant verify sources —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 61.68.212.240 (talk • contribs) .
- I was kind of disposed to overlook all the delete votes until I read the article. Cultural symbol? All I could see was that the culture was one family, perhaps even one person. Delete.--KJPurscell 07:41, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.