Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grace Ueng

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 14:54, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Grace Ueng[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This person does not appear to meet the standards of the general notability guideline. What little I see out and about on the Internet (Google/Google News) is predominantly primary or lacks independence. The same for her business. Google Books is quiet and doesn't appear to have any significant treatment. Izno (talk) 04:20, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 04:25, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 04:25, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 04:25, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg jhp jm 01:29, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom. Not seeing independent sources to establish notability sufficient to meet WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. PohranicniStraze (talk) 02:30, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.